It’s Condoleezza Rice, perhaps. That’s all. The rest is speculation. Many in The party will be happy; they’d begin Re-reading any speeches ere the brawl That’s set in 2012, reviewing those Oft-lauded and condemned decisions made When she was helping W. evade The false or purest reasons to oppose Invasion of Iraq. But any news On how she would compare to other names Thrown in for this election, ere the games Begin, does not exist, except the views That sit within the speeches said before. Analysis must wait a little more.

No comments:
Post a Comment